On 16.02.2018 21:01, Martin Nowak wrote:
On 01/14/2018 12:21 AM, Timon Gehr wrote:what would be the equivalent of this ? ` writeln(tuple!("x", "y", "z")(2, 3, 4).y); `It would continue to work the same way. I did consider adding a proposal for built-in named tuple syntax: writeln((x: 2, y: 3, z: 4).y); (int a, double b) t = (a: 1, b: 2.0); int x = t.a; double y = t.b;Tuples are anonymous bundles, when you want a product type with field names use a struct.
I agree, but Phobos does not.
