On Saturday, 17 February 2018 at 19:37:12 UTC, Steven
Schveighoffer wrote:
On 2/17/18 9:59 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 02/17/2018 09:03 AM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
I found this also works:
static foreach(alias x; S.tupleof)
{
writeln(x.offsetof);
}
Yes, the implementation uses offsetof.
I guess I'm just confused based on the statement "the builtin
.tupleof ... [omits] the essential information of field
offsets."
What is this construct giving us that .tupleof doesn't?
I guess the construct captures offsets as part of type. This is
useful for allocators + 2 things with same Layout can be
bitblitted to each other.
-Steve
