Michal Minich, el 4 de diciembre a las 14:13 me escribiste: > Hello Leandro, > > >I think postconditions should only be able to inspect (in a read-only > >manner) the exception; once the postcondition finished executing, the > >exception should be propagated as is. > > > > heating up the processor for no effect whatsoever?! > > Note also that it is possible, and desired, to use assert statement > in conditions; this statement can throw Error (it is corner case of > changing behavior of program, but we can consider that it is not > changing anything, because it should end the program very fast > anyway).
Well, yes, failing a postcondition should be a non-recoverable Error, and that's an exception, you're right. But I don't think being able to throw any non-Error should be allowed. I think only asserts should be allowed (not throwing using throw), and assert should in post/pre-conditions should dump a core, no more, no less. -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Agitamos toda la zona de la paleta al horno, vemos que una luz nos atraviesa toda la zona intestinal... -- Sidharta Kiwi