Re: Do we need Mat, Vec, TMmat, Diag, Sym and other matrix types?

[9il via Digitalmars-d]

On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 12:45:24 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 at 05:01:38 UTC, 9il wrote:

Maybe we should use only column major order. --Ilya

In my head I had been thinking that the Mat type you want to 
introduce would be just an alias to a 2-dimensional Slice with 
a particular SliceKind and iterator. Am I right on that?


Nope, I mean completely new type, that will hold Contiguous 2D 
Slice as internal payload.