Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Should we sack lazy? I'd like it to have a reasonable replacement. Ideas are welcome!I think they are broken as they are not really lazy, but just convenient syntax for passing delegates.Andrei
In my mind, a lazy parameter should evaluate just once, and save that value. In case of further usage, it should use the saved value instead.
This is actually how I thought they worked until I saw Walter's example with writef(x++).
