On Monday, 14 May 2018 at 01:20:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
Yeah. It's been discussed that it should be illegal to declare a struct or class member named init, but that change has yet to happen.https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7066
Walter and Timon have considered redefinition potentially useful. A compromise would be to require `init` and `stringof` to be `static`. That would probably prevent the accidental conflicts that arise with `init`.
