On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:24:05 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 June 2018 at 07:13:14 UTC, Mike Parker wrote:
Thanks in advance for your participation.
For those of you using the NNTP or mailing list interfaces,
this is the thread to respond in. Thanks!
Alo!
This is great!
Just a clarification about the last paragraph phrasing
The last line: "We can further reduce this problem by calling the
function opPostMove." seemed to imply that an alternate name to
opPostMove would be mentioned, but am I correct in understanding
that it is just saying that "naming this second function as op*
will keep code breakage to a minimum" ?
Also, what should happen if someone defines an opPostMove for a
class. Compile error or? Should something about that be mentioned?
Cheers
- Ali
