On 12/07/2018 3:58 AM, Luís Marques wrote:
I was surprised to find out today that this compiles:
void foo() {}
void foo() {}
void main() {}
Is it a bug, or just a weird design decision? "alphaglosined" on IRC
seemed to think it was a regression. Please confirm, so that I can file
a bug, or understand the design decision rationale.
The reason I think that it is a regression is because of [0].
Either the change log didn't include some changes, environment/linker or
its a regression IMHO.
```
Up to 2.071.2: Failure with output:
-----
onlineapp.o: In function `_D9onlineapp3fooFiZv':
/sandbox/onlineapp.d:2: multiple definition of `_D9onlineapp3fooFiZv'
onlineapp.o:onlineapp.d:(.text._D9onlineapp3fooFiZv+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
--- errorlevel 1
-----
2.072.2 to 2.074.1: Failure with output:
-----
onlineapp.o: In function `_D9onlineapp3fooFiZv':
/sandbox/onlineapp.d:2: multiple definition of `_D9onlineapp3fooFiZv'
onlineapp.o:onlineapp.d:(.text._D9onlineapp3fooFiZv+0x0): first defined here
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Error: linker exited with status 1
-----
Since 2.075.1: Success and no output
```
[0] https://run.dlang.io/is/AGuM6P
