On Friday, 13 July 2018 at 16:02:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/13/18 11:14 AM, Atila Neves wrote:
[...]
Great. Razvan, can you please add this example with discussion
to the DIP (probably at the end of the Motivation section as an
explanation why we need the addition of @implicit). Thanks.
[...]
Interesting. Coming from a C++ background makes the matter
obvious because there's plenty of implicit vs. explicit
discussion. To compensate for my bias - what do you think would
be a better attribute name?
Andrei
Why "@implicit" is an attribute and not a keyword?
-Alexander
