On Thursday, 30 August 2018 at 12:18:10 UTC, Elie Morisse wrote:
On Monday, 11 June 2018 at 15:41:57 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer
wrote:
I filed a bug about a similar thing (calling private functions
instead of using private variables), but it seemed to be
agreed upon that this is expected behavior:
https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15897
You may find some more insight from reading that discussion. I
don't agree with the conclusion, as it is very surprising
behavior to me.
-Steve
Not the same, bauss' case is a template method that wouldn't
get the depreciation warning if it wasn't templated. Template
instances not always having the same access privileges as their
template declaration's is definitely a bug.
Or actually since I didn't test the code it's more likely just
due to T being Bar, in which case there's no reason to make the
cast to Foo mandatory since Foo's field get accessed from Foo's
method.
