On Friday, 14 September 2018 at 18:13:49 UTC, Eugene Wissner
wrote:
Makes the code unreadable.
It is the foo: that causes this, not the __not...
For @nogc, pure and so forth there were imho a better proposal
with a boolean value:
@gc(true), @gc(false), pure(true), pure(false) etc. It is also
consistent with the existing UDA syntax.
Yes, I still actually prefer that proposal, but it has been
around for a long time and still isn't here.
I want something, ANYTHING to unset these things. I don't care
which proposal or which syntax, I just want it to be possible.
