On Saturday, 20 October 2018 at 15:10:38 UTC, Nathan S. wrote:

Other opportunities would rely on being able to identify if it's ever more efficient to write `memset(&x, 0, typeof(x).sizeof)` instead of `x = typeof(x).init` which seems like the kind of optimization that belongs in the compiler instead.

Not unless `mem{set, cpy, move}` etc. are made into compiler intrinsics. Carrying libc dependencies into low-level sensitive code just stinks. If anything, the `memcpy` calls should be removed from `moveEmplace`, not `memset` calls added to it.
They're also not CTFE-able.

Reply via email to