On 22.10.18 11:40, Manu wrote:
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 2:21 AM ag0aep6g via Digitalmars-d
<digitalmars-d@puremagic.com> wrote:
[...]
I don't agree. I prefer the stronger @trusted. As far as I know, the
stronger one is the current one.
The current one has the critical weakness that it causes **EVERY
USER** to write unsafe code, manually casting things to shared.
You're conflating @trusted with `shared`. As I've tried to show, your
version of `shared` probably doesn't need the weaker @trusted. It can
work with the stronger one.
And I'm not trying to defend the current `shared` in any way.
You're here spouting some fantasy
With these snarky asides, you're making it difficult to argue for your side.
