bearophile Wrote: > myself). If this is true then a syntax like: > auto immutable x = y * 2; > > can be seen as too much long and boring to write all the time, so the > "immutable" keyword may need to be changed again :-) For example into "val" > (also as "retard" has said), so it becomes shorter (here "auto" is present if > and only if the programmer wants type inference, as I have written in other > posts, to clean up its semantics): > auto val x = y * 2;
How about "fixed"? It's a little longer than val, but still carries "set in stone" semantics. auto fixed x = y * 2;
