On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:44:29PM -0300, Leandro Lucarella wrote: > I don't understand, you are vulnerable to that kind of bugs now too: > > const receiver = 1; > > const reciever = 2; // meant to rebind, but spelling error goes unnoticed by > compiler
Right, but it is more of a conscious effort to type const X = x; than it is to type X := x;. If you wanted to do immutable by default, wouldn't that means you get yourself in the habit of typing := instead of =? That's not the same as training yourself to type const (or immutable) where you would have typed auto before. Maybe I don't understand the proposal :S -- Adam D. Ruppe http://arsdnet.net
