"dsimcha" <dsim...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:hjd1h5$2s3...@digitalmars.com... > == Quote from Nick Sabalausky (a...@a.a)'s article >> ++vote > > The more idiomatic convention on this forum is vote++. Is using ++vote an > optimization in hope of making this happen faster?
Pet peeve, really. I've always found the semantics of post-inc/dec to be next-to-useless for anything besides obfuscation. Whenever I get around to designing my own language, "++x" will be dissalowed and "x++" will have pre-increment semantics.
