"John D" <jd...@googling.com> wrote in message news:hk3f9m$1t0...@digitalmars.com... > > "Walter Bright" <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message > news:hk3bld$1k1...@digitalmars.com... >> John D wrote: >>> "Walter Bright" <newshou...@digitalmars.com> wrote in message >>> news:hk1uso$1om...@digitalmars.com... >>>> John D wrote: >>>>> Commonly called "2 step construction". But you forgot to add the check >>>>> on the return val from c.create(). >>>> No need to - c.create() should throw if it fails. >>>> >>> >>> What's the point of doing 2-step construction if not to avoid >>> exceptions? >> >> It's so the default initialization cannot fail, which is handy in cases >> where dealing with failure is problematic. > > Pffft. Said the backend compiler writer. So let it be written. >
Why are you even here?
