Michel Fortin wrote:
So what's the plan? Should everything theoretically safe in Phobos be @trusted to avoid complains about unnecessary checks in programs that don't bother about safety? Or should we make things @safe and promote them to @trusted (for performance) only after a careful review? I'm a proponent of not making anything @trusted in Phobos until it has been reviewed and approved by someone else than the author.
Every function in Phobos needs to be reviewed and tagged as safe, trusted or system as appropriate.
