On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:11:49PM -0600, Ellery Newcomer wrote: > Awesome. It doesn't work for opPow, though.
Probably because I used assembly there, and opPow wouldn't be implemented as a simple instruction. Reimplementing it in that function and watching for the overflow ourself would work, but would probably be really slow. > > And aha! put a static opCall in conjunction with opAssign and you can > assign when declaring it. This ought to be in the docs somewhere where I > can find it.. Oh yeah, that's right. I think it is in the struct page of the website, but this is one of those things that's easy to forget. I'd really like to see opCall change in structs so it is more intuitive. Problem is, I don't have a better proposal. -- Adam D. Ruppe http://arsdnet.net
