Robert Clipsham, el 26 de febrero a las 22:32 me escribiste: > On 26/02/10 21:48, Don wrote: > >I genuinely thought @pure, @nothrow was a no-brainer. > > > >I really thought the explanation that "we made all attibutes use the @ > >form, except those where it was prevented by historical precedent" was > >quite defensible. > > > >But I was very, very wrong. Looks like the community is giving a massive > >vote for complete unpredictability. > > > ><Throws hands in air /> > > I don't see why people seem to be against this, @pure and @nothrow > seem to fit right in under what I think of as attributes. Historical > reasons seems perfectly valid to me, considering most users will be > coming to D from other languages as opposed to learning from > scratch. I agree the rules you suggested need a little tweaking > before they're there, they're along the right lines though.
I'm not against this, I'm against weird ad-hoc rules to justify it =) -- Leandro Lucarella (AKA luca) http://llucax.com.ar/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- GPG Key: 5F5A8D05 (F8CD F9A7 BF00 5431 4145 104C 949E BFB6 5F5A 8D05) ----------------------------------------------------------------------
