Walter Bright Wrote: > retard wrote: > > The associative array is a sad type in D. It has nasty semantics. I'd > > like to see it as a real library defined type with just syntactic sugar > > for constructing literals. Too bad that's not what Walter thinks. > > Actually, that's how D2 associative arrays are done.
But the point of this thread was not this one :-( I have added a little enhancement request... http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3889 bearophile
