BCS wrote:
Hello Walter,
Don wrote:
If that's true, then perhaps a more restricted solution is better.
Eg, use Walter's proposal ONLY if the static initializer is mixed in.
I should note that all static constructors in a module are combined
into one function. So, the mixin static initializers are combined with
any other static initializers.
Does it have to run that way or could you lump them into several pieces
and have them call each other as needed?
Right now, they are defined to run in lexical order. Regrouping them in
arbitrary orders will mess up intra-module ordering dependencies.
