Ellery Newcomer wrote:
What do you think of Erlang's bit syntax if you've looked at it, or could you if you haven't?
I know nothing about it.
- Re: An idea (Re: Implicit enum conversion... bearophile
- Re: An idea (Re: Implicit enum conversions ar... Nick Sabalausky
- Re: An idea (Re: Implicit enum conversion... Regan Heath
- Re: An idea (Re: Implicit enum conver... Nick Sabalausky
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PITA grauzone
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PI... bearophile
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PI... Walter Bright
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupi... bearophile
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a s... Walter Bright
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupi... Ellery Newcomer
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a s... Walter Bright
- Re: Implicit enum conversions ar... Ellery Newcomer
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PITA bearophile
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PI... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Bug 3999 [Was: Re: Implicit enum conversi... bearophile
- Re: Bug 3999 [Was: Re: Implicit enum ... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Bug 3999 [Was: Re: Implicit ... Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Bug 3999 bearophile
- Re: Bug 3999 [Was: Re: Impli... Andrei Alexandrescu
- Re: Bug 3999 [Was: Re: Impli... Lars T. Kyllingstad
- Re: Implicit enum conversions are a stupid PITA yigal chripun
