Jérôme M. Berger Wrote: > Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > > Fails for test case: > > > > minA = 4, maxA = 4, minB = 4, maxB = 6 (outputs 7, accurate result is 6). > > > Nope, outputs 6. Note that I've run an exhaustive search for all > combinations in the [0, 63] range, so if there are mistakes they > have to be outside that range... >
I'll have to double check, I thought I copied your code verbatim (I did switch around the arguments to be minA, maxA, minB, maxB to fit my test harness, and I changed the uint_32_t to uint). I'll check tomorrow at work where the computer I used to test is. -Steve
