On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:00:32 +0400, Clemens <eriatark...@gmail.com> wrote:
Walter Bright Wrote:
* Not all functional programming languages do concurrency well. Haskell
and
OCaml in particular have severe fundamental problems with it such that
parallelizing your code makes it slower.
Do you have a reference on that? I'll produce one to the contrary:
http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~dons/blog/2007/11/29#smoking-4core
Haskell is cool but I am puzzled with that Haskell vs C example.
What is he comparing? Parallel Haskell vs what?
Also he is right by using the argument "naive",
but more likely "naive use of the language" for a given algorithm, the
very thing you arguing against?
I'd like to see the comparisons of a "non-naive" implementations too :)
--
Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/
