bearophile wrote:
> @manifest int x = 2010; // we use this. :-) :DI don't like that a lot :-) It's almost worse than "enum". Try again.
The idea is to reduce the number of keywords, so the use of @ is a must.But like I suggested, alternatively we could simply replace enum manifests with the 'pure' keyword. So 'pure' would have two meanings, depending on whether the symbol is a variable or a function.
-- Dil: http://code.google.com/p/dil/
