On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 06:13, Graham Fawcett <fawc...@uwindsor.ca> wrote:
> > 'trunk/dranges' would be fine -- keeping 'trunk' makes good sense for > a Subversion project. For my purposes, any depth is okay, e.g. > 'trunk/src/lang/d2/dranges' would also work. The key is that modules > which belong to the 'dranges' package should exist in a 'dranges' > directory. > OK. I admit switching to a package.module naming convention quite recently (a month or so), so it's still a bit incomplete. I should have done that. > > What I'm doing is adding the parent of the 'dranges' directory to > dmd's include-path. Then I just let DMD look up the module files using > its own conventions (e.g. DMD expects that a module named foo.bar.baz > will be defined in a file named foo/bar/baz.d). That's why I renamed > trunk to dranges: it was the easiest way to honour the DMD naming > convention. > > OK, got it. I'll add a dranges directory inside trunk today. And add a dranges dir in the downloadable .zip.That'a another alternative you have: look inside /download if there is something to get. I'm following your project with interest, as that'd be cool to have an easy-to-use tool to grap projects. I use dstats from time to time and just dumped the files into my own project file, but a command-line tool is better. Philippe