On 28/05/2010 11:03, Bruno Medeiros wrote: > On 26/05/2010 21:14, Masahiro Nakagawa wrote: >> >> I think we need improvement of DDoc. >> Current DDoc doesn't keep up with D Spec(e.g. ignore @attribute, pure, >> etc...). > > I very much agree with this. >
Oops, my mind slipped. I actually misread that as "I think we need improvement of the D Documentation", namely the specification, and that's what I was agreeing with. Not that DDoc doesn't need to be improved as well, but its important to update the spec before much time passes by. It makes it harder for newbies to learn the language, or even people like me who where away from D and the NG for a long period of time, and are not familiar with all the latest changes. Sure, there is Andrei's book coming out, but a more succinct reference such as the spec is needed eventually. -- Bruno Medeiros - Software Engineer