Steven Schveighoffer wrote: > On Sun, 06 Jun 2010 14:48:27 -0400, Johan Granberg > <lijat.me...@ovegmail.com> wrote: > > >> I also think a set would be highly usefull, and when defining it pleas >> don't >> let the set operations (union,intersection,maybe complement) be defined. >> I >> recently was writing some c++ code and got a nasty preformance hit from >> not >> finding a fast set union operation. > > I don't understand this. What better place to put set operations such as > intersection and union besides the implementation of the set itself?
I think that the complaint is that they _weren't_ included in the implementation itself, and he hopes that D's implementation _does_ include them. - Jonathan M Davis