Don wrote: [snip]
Or is too late to break backwards compatibility with B ?
We can and should do it. It won't impact TDPL adversely.
A perhaps little known thing is that D doesn't allow this:
int a, b, c;
if (a < b < c) { ... }
although it's compilable code in C. The same strategy could be used for
combinations of badly-prioritized operators: the language could just
require the user to add parens.
Andrei
