Michel Fortin:
> But what about the "case 1: ... case 10:" syntax?
>
> switch (x) {
> case 1: .. case 10:
> case 22: .. case 32:
> case 52, 64:
> doSomething();
> break;
> default:
> whatever();
> break;
> }
Sorry, in my first answer I have a bit partially misunderstood your question.
You can write that like this, but I think this is not compatible with the
current syntax (after commas you can of course add a newline):
case 1: .. case 10, case 22: .. case 32, 52, 64:
Otherwise you can keep them splitted (this needs no syntax changes):
case 1: .. case 10: goto case;
case 22: .. case 32: goto case;
case 52, 64:
One of my original proposals was this, that now can not be used:
case 1 ... 10, 22 ... 32, 52, 64:
Bye,
bearophile
