Sean Kelly wrote:
Rory McGuire Wrote:
On Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:36:15 +0200, Sean Kelly <s...@invisibleduck.org>
wrote:
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
We haven't reached consensus on where to put enforce() and friends. Any
other ideas? Of the above, I like std.checks.
Better yet, how about defining std.exception that includes a host of
exception-related functionality (such as defining exceptions that retain
file and line, perhaps stack traces etc.)?
The trace functionality already exists in druntime. As for exceptions,
they may belong there as well if they're ones the runtime should be
aware of.
How does one get a print out of the stack trace then? Is it a setting or
something?
I should qualify my original statement by saying that it's only implemented for
Linux and OSX so far. I have some of the declarations in for the Windows
implementation but haven't gotten to it yet.
My stack traces look indecipherable on Ubuntu. They only contain module
name and memory address.
Andrei
