Jacob Carlborg Wrote: > On 2010-07-06 17.01, Adam Ruppe wrote: > > On 7/6/10, bearophile<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I don't think that's a good idea, you lose the standard API of Nullable, so > >> it's worse than useless. > > > > Make that standard API free functions, like std.array does. Then, it > > would work with all nullable items, and not just Nullable ones. > > Uniformity is good. > > Uniform function call syntax isn't implemented (issue 3382), if you're > referring to that.
Strange... I could have sworn that when I recently tried D2, arrays supported range methods (popFront etc), and that those were implemented in std.array. Am I mistaken, or how does that work?
