On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:51:57 +0200, Rory McGuire <rmcgu...@neonova.co.za>
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:08:06 +0200, Jesse Phillips
<jesse.k.phill...@gmail.com> wrote:
But then you can't overload operators.
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 12:54 AM, Rory McGuire <rmcgu...@neonova.co.za>
wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 01:51:51 +0200, Jesse Phillips
<jessekphillip...@gmail.com> wrote:
What about:
struct String {
string items;
alias items this;
}
And add the needed functions you wish to have in string and it will
still
work in existing functions that operate on immutable(char)[]
You shouldn't need to do that:
string strstr(string haystack, string needle);
can be used as:
string s;
s.strstr("needle");
so you can add "methods" to a string or whatever just by defining
functions.
-Rory
such as?
I mean is there not another way to do the same thing?
