sybrandy: > Agreed. I'm also a big fan of examples as it's very easy to look at an > example and get something working. Then, once you see it work and get > somewhat of an understanding, you can dig deeper into the details to > learn more.
I am not sure, but I think find() is not what I need, even if you add lot of usage examples to it. (It seems my list of find-like micropatterns got ignored, I don't know why, maybe they don't look enough like things done by STL C++.) Bye, bearophile