BCS:
> How is pragma(msg,) buggy? It does exactly what it's supposed to do. Unless 
> you can point to a deficiency that it has and something that fixes it. I 
> see no reason to consider dumping it.

The thing is is supposed to do is not useful enough, as I have explained in my 
bug report/enhancement request. And even if you want to keep it, it's buggy & 
messy anyway, because it accepts as input things that it is not able to digest 
correctly. It is currently buggy, and I see no reason to keep it when there is 
a better replacement. I don't understand what people as you see good in 
pragma(msg), I think you are just mistaken or you have not used it often enough 
yet. The ctputs I have suggested can go in the std.intrisic module.

Bye,
bearophile

Reply via email to