Steven Schveighoffer Wrote:
[...]
> Hold on, can't we have enforce and lenforce (lazy enforce)?
Or couldn't we have an overload for enforce that takes a string, and another
overload that takes a void delegate returning a string?
It makes the syntax a little grottier, but...
> From a simple grep, 99% of enforce instances are:
> enforce(condition)
> -or-
> enforce(condition, "compile-time-string")
> -or-
> enforce(condition, "compile-time-string" ~ type.stringof)
...if you have to write
enforce(condition,
(){ return "compile-time-string" ~ type.stringof; });
one time in a hundred, is it really that bad?
Cheers,
Pillsy
