"cglee" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Hi, > > I have used 'C' and 'jav'a for several years. > When I need speed, I used 'C'. > When I have to reduce implemetation time, I used 'java'. > In my view, D language has both merits from 'C' and 'java'. > It means that it is OOP, but it generates native binary > without VM. We already have C++ as this. But C++ makes me > more confused when I use it. > > Now, I have questions about how much 'D' is fast comparing with 'java' > and how much bigger in binary size generated by 'D' comparing with > 'C'. Is there anyone has information about this?. >
http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-updated-graphs-with-rapidxml/ http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/10/xml-benchmarks-parsequerymutateserialize/ http://dotnot.org/blog/archives/2008/03/12/why-is-dtango-so-fast-at-parsing-xml/
