Re: The Status of Const

[Simen kjaeraas]

Michel Fortin <michel.for...@michelf.com> wrote:

        Object o; // implicitly a reference
        Object ref o; // explicit reference marker

Both would be allowed and equivalent. While the first form is nicer to the eye, the second makes it easy to apply a type modifier while excluding the reference:

        const(Object)ref o;
        shared(Object)ref o;

This is awesome. Now, if only W or A could have a look, and not shoot
it down...

--
Simen