Hello Nick,
"Walter Bright" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Yea. If Java's design philosophy were a valid one, there would never
have been any reason to move beyond Altair-style programming (ie,
entering machine code (not asm) in binary, one byte at a time, via
physical toggle switches). You *can* do anything you need like that
(It's Turing-complete!).
Yeah, and I've seen OOP done in C, and it works. It's just awful.
I've even seen OOP done in assembler (Optlink!).
I've seen high-precision PI calculation done in MS batch:
http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/Stupid-Coding-Tricks-A-Batch-of-Pi.asp
x
And Adam Ruppe did cgi in Asm:
http://www.arsdnet.net/cgi-bin/a.out
And some massochist did a compile-time raytracer in C++:
http://ompf.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1556
Yea, I know that had already been done in D, but D's compile-time
processing doesn't suck :)
Um... does Boost fit in here?
--
... <IXOYE><
