bearophile wrote:
HLA allows you to have a 1:1 mapping, if you want.
You can find answers here:
http://webster.cs.ucr.edu/AsmTools/HLA/HLADoc/HTMLDoc/hlafaq.txt
Look especially at the answer to questions 6 and 23.
I found this amusing:
===============================================
6: q. Why is HLA necessary? What's wrong with MASM,
TASM, GAS, or NASM? Do we really need another
incompatible assembler out there?
a. HLA was written with two purposes in mind: The
first was to provide a tool that makes it very
easy (or, at least, easier) to teach assembly
language programming to University students.
Experiences at UCR bear out the success of
HLA's design (even with prototype/alpha code
with tons of bugs and little documentation,
students are producing better projects than
past courses that used MASM).
===============================================
because they weren't teaching assembler, they were teaching their pascal-like
embedded language. Of course that's easier than assembler, but it isn't assembler.
