Don: > Well, I would hate for somebody to waste their time trying to optimise > that problem either for speed or memory consumption, when both are > limited by a fairly simple, short-term library issue.
What is the short-term Phobos issue that limits the memory usage? In the current Phobos2 I have not found any easy-to-use mean to transform that eager D version into a lazy version that uses about 1/10 of the memory it currently uses (s in the second Python version). Bye, bearophile