Re: Proposal: Relax rules for 'pure'

[klickverbot]

On 9/22/10 9:14 PM, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
Hypothetical counter-case
struct S
{
version(stronglypure)
string s;
else
char[] s;
}

pure foo(S s); // changes strength depending on S' contents

-Steve

This is a change to the signature of foo – S with the stronglypure 
version defined and S without it are two completely distinct types.