2010/9/25 "Jérôme M. Berger" <jeber...@free.fr>: > Basically, all it does is defining a namespace for keywords. Since > you can't define identifiers with an @, then whenever Walter wants > to add a new keyword, he only has to pick one that start with @ to > make sure that he won't break anyone's code.
I see. It guess it's good idea to have a namespace for lesser-used keywords to avoid naming conflicts. My first impression was that @ttributes were specialized comments, since the absence of @property doesn't stop you from using property syntax, and @disable just produces a nicer error message from the compiler.
