On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:14:27 -0400, BLS <[email protected]> wrote:
On 29/09/2010 21:19, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Wednesday, September 29, 2010 11:58:01 BLS wrote:
Hope is was not a pipe dream...
I've no idea who has published it and where to find this snippet but in
case that I am not completely wrong there should exist something like
Implements!() for structures..
???
Bjoern
And what would the implement? I thought that structs didn't work with
interfaces. And if they did, you'd use is() with : to test that. So,
what are
you really looking for here? What would Implements!() do if it exists?
- Jonathan M Davis
Hi Jonathan,
Just because structures don't work with interfaces I am still hoping for
Implements!().
What do I expect from Implements! A contract which ensures (at compile
time) that a structure implements f.i. all functions required by a
random access range.
well, as said, I'm not even sure that Implements! exist at all.
bjoern
Well, there are the isRandomAccessRange and friends, I think that's the
standard mode of operation for testing if a struct implements a particular
compile-time interface.
The thing is, there's no syntax to *define* a compile-time interface
except this way :)
So Implements!(myStruct, ???) Where ??? is the compile time interface,
what do you pass in there?
-Steve
