Re: Tuple literal syntax

[bearophile]

Simen kjaeraas:

> Perhaps it would be possible to augment struct static initializers for
> this purpose?
> 
> { int a; string b } foo( ) {
>      return { 1, "text" };
> }

What kind of tuple unpacking syntax do you suggest for this? (I think at the 
moment the unpacking syntax is more important than the literals one).

Bye,
bearophile