2010/10/11 Tomek Sowiński <j...@ask.me>: > Philippe Sigaud napisał: > >> As you can see, an "open or closed for both ends" policy could be >> interesting to add. In the previous example, is 1.0 a correct value? > > It can be handled as in std.random: Bounded!(T, min, max, string bounds = > "[)"). But with "[]" > as default.
Yes, good idea. I suggest that for integral types (+ chars) is automatically closed at both ends. That what most people want. The opening make sense only for floating point or custom types.
