On 10/11/2010 08:57 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
But right now the point is: join() does something completely different and should be renamed (or deprecated in std.string and replaced by union() - a real join isn't needed in std.string anyway, but when join() is deprecated in std.string you can implement a real join in std.algorithm without causing too much confusion).
I think union() is a worse name than join(). The discussion was to generalize within reason std.string.join, which is present under that name and with that functionality in many other languages and libraries.
Andrei
