== Quote from bearophile ([email protected])'s article > A link found through Reddit, a benchmark about Move Semantics Benchmark in C++ STL: > http://cpp-next.com/archive/2010/10/howards-stl-move-semantics- benchmark/ > Bye, > bearophile
I don't really like that benchmark. I think it will deceive people into thinking that supported move semantics are going to give your programs huge speed improvements. In reality, you wouldn't do all those things with those massive objects. A real benchmark would take some standard C++ program, add any extra move constructors where applicable, and then compare the performance to the program without move constructors. That way, you're actually seeing what move semantics will really bring to the performance of a real program.
