According to wikipedia, duck typing is a style of dynamic typing where an object's methods/properties determine what i can do.
On Sat, Oct 16, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Kagamin <s...@here.lot> wrote: > Michel Fortin Wrote: > > > The problem is that D doesn't have duck-typing. The adapter pattern > > isn't duck-typing. Duck-typing is when you have an object and can call > > a 'quack' function on it and if there's no 'quack' function you get a > > runtime error. > > Isn't that dynamic typing? >
